Intelligence is a much desired characteristic for many. We are happy when people regard us as being clever or smart. We also admire other people who are intelligent, and think that this is characteristic will lead us to eventual success and happiness.
IQ tests are generally held to be the best measures of intelligence. When a person gets high scores in a reputable and well made instrument meant to approximate his/her intelligence, we think of that person as being intelligent. In fact, the most famous organization for intellectually gifted people, Mensa, has only one requirement for anybody to be a member, and that is to have a top 2% score in an approved intelligence test.
Traditionally, intelligence refers to areas most akin to school learning. This concept of intelligence focuses on logical reasoning, detail orientation, mathematical abilities, memory, and language mastery. Whereas these are important in school learning, it often has very little to do with the tasks that relate to work life in adulthood.
Many studies done have proved that IQ scores have little to do with one’s success or happiness in one’s life. Surprisingly, it also has little to do with the amount of money a person earns. Although most of these studies are done in the United States, I have a hunch that these findings are true for us in the Philippines as well.
Despite the general acceptance of many when it comes to the validity of the assumption that intelligence tests measure intelligence, this is actually no longer the approach that many psychologists have in the use of these measures. In fact, Howard Gardener’s theory of multiple intelligences questioned the whole idea that intelligence is only a single set of abilities. He was the first to challenge the notion that there is only one kind of intelligence, and that is what IQ tests measure. He says that people are talented in different ways, and these are also legitimate expressions of intelligence. So, a person who might not do well in school because he or she is not good in English or Mathematics may be intelligent in the area of sports or dancing. This person can also be said to be intelligent in the way he moves and controls his body, despite his areas of weakness in the traditional notion of intelligence.
As a psychologist, one of my primary roles is to understand a person’s abilities and areas of weaknesses so that he or she can maximize his strengths and improve his areas of weakness. As such, IQ scores are only important as they clarify a person’s strengths and areas of weakness. With this perspective, I am better able to facilitate the holistic development of the individuals that I have had the opportunity to get to know.
I do agree that intelligence is a desirable characteristic. However, an IQ score, even from the best IQ test, cannot begin to describe the range of strengths and gifts that any individual brings with him or her. We need to see the IQ score with its limitations before we can fully appreciate how it can serve our purposes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yes. How true. IQ is but one aspect of the whole.
ReplyDeleteThe way society is structured makes it hard to see IQ as only one aspect. The educational system in most countries have an imaginary IQ threshold for each level of education. The higher the educational level, the greater the potential earning power. Hence our socio-economic status is tied to our IQ from the perspective of the average person.
Though in reality, society may not reflect that clear a relationship between IQ and socio-economic status, at least conceptually, many people hold the view that the relationship is true. Statistically, in the broader sense, also imply this is true since society places a higher value on jobs that require a high level of IQ.
with so many things that we hold important - status and money - at stake, it's understandable why IQ seems so important to many. It helps to see there are other aspects of intelligence when looking at a person as a whole.
Is that picture C-3PO? Doesn't (s)he used to be golden?
ReplyDeleteHi, DarthVader.
ReplyDeleteInteresting name.
Research has shown that there is no significant relationship between one's educational attainment or IQ to one's financial success. In the same way, educational atteinment, IQ level, and wealth also have very little to do with one's happiness. And yet, we all continue to think in these terms. I guess this is the reason that I decided to write something on this topic. I hope I was able to drive that point across.
No, the picture on this entry is not C3PO. It is an interactive robot from the Singapore Discovery Centre, named Little George.
Do keep the comments coming.
Hi sir! its ME your student number 28 in Cog. I find this very interesting. Back in high school my class took an IQ test and i found out i had really high IQ. There was only one guy in class higher than me. the weird thing is the smartest person in my class did NOT have high IQ. it was very surprising because he was always perfect in every subject. i guess a lot of it is just hard work. after i found out that i had high IQ, i kinda got lazy with school. like I would think to myself "I'm sure ill pass, i have high IQ anyway." but thinking about it now i guess having it doesn't really matter but its how you use what you have. yeah!
ReplyDeleteHi, Emy! Thanks for reading my blog.
ReplyDeleteYou are right that what really matters is how you use whatever talent you have. There are many factors that are not related to intelligence that contribute to a person's happiness and/or success.
Hope you read the other entries as well. And do leave your comments.
will do sir! after i finish all the papers and research that experimental psychology is demanding of me. hahaha!
ReplyDeleteI can relate to Emy.
ReplyDeleteBack in high school we took an IQ test in which i scored pretty high. this made me slack off as i knew i could pass all the test our school gave us.
fastforward to college:
first week in a prestigious school in Metro Manila they gave us an EQ test. given my bloated head and bad study habits honed to an art during high school, its not surprising that i scored a dismal 2% out of the total batch population... they even had an accuracy rating that showed my score to be 24/26 accurate. after showing us our grade, the facilitator told me mortality rate is 20%. so basically if im in bottom 20% chances are im gonna get kicked out. and that my high IQ wasnt going to help me either because in that school everyone was above average...
i still wet my bed dreaming about that sometimes.
anyway that thought scared me into studying all the way to graduation day.
walking dictionaries are overrated nowadays. just get an itouch.
Your story tells me that it's really never too late to learn a good lesson.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing!